Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Warde Manuel Discusses South Carolina’s Ranking Over LSU in College Football Playoff

Warde Manuel discusses the rationale behind South Carolina's higher ranking than LSU in the playoffs.

LSU may have triumphed over South Carolina on the field earlier this season, but when it comes to the College Football Playoff rankings, the Gamecocks have managed to leapfrog the Tigers. How did this happen, especially considering the head-to-head matchup? The answer lies in the broader context of each team’s performance since that pivotal game.

Understanding the Rankings: A Deeper Look

Selection committee chair Warde Manuel provided insight into the reasoning behind the rankings. He explained that the overall body of work is more significant than just the outcome of one game. “Yeah, it really came down to the committee felt that since that game, South Carolina and LSU have gone in different directions,” Manuel stated. This perspective emphasizes that while head-to-head results are important, they are not the only factor in determining a team’s standing.

South Carolina’s Resurgence

Since their loss to LSU in mid-September, the Gamecocks have shown remarkable resilience. They have only faced defeat twice since then, and both losses were against teams currently ranked in the Top 10. In contrast, South Carolina has achieved an impressive three-game winning streak, which includes a dominant 44-20 victory over a ranked Texas A&M team. This performance has undoubtedly caught the committee’s attention and contributed to their rise in the rankings.

LSU’s Recent Struggles

On the flip side, LSU started the season strong after a disappointing opener against USC. However, as the season progressed, the Tigers have stumbled, dropping two consecutive SEC games and facing a significant defeat recently. The loss to USC, which seemed manageable at first, has become more troubling as the Trojans have struggled in their own right. This downward trend for LSU has played a crucial role in their ranking drop.

Head-to-Head vs. Body of Work

So, what does this mean for the head-to-head matchup? While LSU may have won their game against South Carolina, the committee’s evaluation extended beyond that single result. “But in this particular case, we also looked at the body of work and where those teams are,” Manuel explained. The committee assessed how each team has performed since their encounter, and it became clear that South Carolina had been on an upward trajectory while LSU faced challenges.

The Committee’s Perspective

The selection committee’s decision reflects a broader philosophy in college football rankings. Winning games consistently, especially against strong opponents, can outweigh a single loss, even if it was against the same team. The committee’s approach is to evaluate not just the results but the context surrounding those results. Manuel emphasized this point, stating, “We do look at head-to-head. We obviously consider that closely. We look at that in our evaluation and determine when a team — we take a good hard look when teams play head-to-head and the outcome of the game.”

What Lies Ahead for Both Teams

As the season progresses, both teams have the opportunity to shape their destinies. For South Carolina, maintaining their momentum will be key. With a favorable schedule ahead, they could solidify their position in the rankings. LSU, on the other hand, must regroup quickly. The Tigers need to find a way to bounce back and reclaim their earlier form to stay in contention for a playoff spot.

The Bigger Picture

The situation between LSU and South Carolina serves as a reminder of the unpredictable nature of college football. Teams can rise and fall dramatically within a matter of weeks. The rankings are not just about who won or lost on a particular day; they reflect ongoing narratives and performances throughout the season.

In this ever-evolving landscape, fans are left to wonder: can LSU turn their season around, or will South Carolina continue their ascent? The coming weeks will be critical for both teams as they strive for playoff contention.

As the excitement builds, one thing is clear: college football never fails to deliver drama, surprises, and unforgettable moments. The rankings may shift, but the passion for the game remains unwavering.

X
Facebook
WhatsApp
Telegram

Today´s Best